Home 603588 vs TMRAF 603588 vs TMRAF: Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering vs Tomra Systems ASA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering is 7.2× the market cap of Tomra Systems ASA. 603588 trades at a lower P/E than TMRAF. TMRAF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603588 TMRAF Current Price CN¥15.69 $13.00 Daily Change -0.06% 0.12% 1-Year Return 200.00% -11.28% 52-Week High CN¥18.45 $17.29 52-Week Low CN¥5.31 $11.04 50-Day MA CN¥13.48 — 200-Day MA CN¥8.91 — Beta 0.87 1.44
Size & Revenue Metric 603588 TMRAF Market Cap $24.86B $3.45B Enterprise Value $34.31B $4.09B Revenue (TTM) $14.73B $1.32B Shares Outstanding 1.52B 295.40M Float 1.04B 202.91M Employees 4,834 —
Valuation Metric 603588 TMRAF Trailing P/E 20.40 32.42 Forward P/E 0.00 24.83 Price / Sales 1.69 2.62 Price / Book 2.33 5.10 EV / EBITDA 16.31 15.61
Profitability Metric 603588 TMRAF Profit Margin 5.69% 7.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 11.05% 16.83% Return on Equity 10.11% 15.60% Return on Assets 3.79% 5.38% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.80 0.36
Growth Metric 603588 TMRAF Revenue Growth (YoY) 50.00% -3.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -2.60% -11.60%
Dividends Metric 603588 TMRAF Dividend Yield 0.64% 193.00% Dividend / Share 0.10 0.23
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603588 TMRAF Sortino (Composite) 10.18 0.64 Sharpe (Composite) 5.86 0.39 Calmar (Composite) 18.17 0.93 Hurst Exponent 0.5980 0.4562 Piotroski F-Score 8/9 — Magic Formula Rank #18,529 —
Ownership Metric 603588 TMRAF % Insiders 3206.90% 0.10% % Institutions 541.10% 83.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.