Sign up for free insights newsletter

603588 vs CWY: Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering vs Cleanaway Waste Management Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥15.69
-0.06%
China
$24.86B
CW
CWYAustralian Securities Exchange
A$2.31
+2.21%
Australia
$5.11B

Quick Summary

Beijing GeoEnviron Engineering is 4.9× the market cap of Cleanaway Waste Management Ltd. 603588 trades at a lower P/E than CWY. CWY offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric603588CWY
Current PriceCN¥15.69A$2.31
Daily Change-0.06%2.21%
1-Year Return200.00%-11.15%
52-Week HighCN¥18.45A$2.95
52-Week LowCN¥5.31A$2.25
50-Day MACN¥13.48A$2.39
200-Day MACN¥8.91A$2.63
Beta0.870.62

Size & Revenue

Metric603588CWY
Market Cap$24.86B$5.11B
Enterprise Value$34.31B$7.36B
Revenue (TTM)$14.73B$4.12B
Shares Outstanding1.52B2.24B
Float1.04B2.10B
Employees4,83410,000

Valuation

Metric603588CWY
Trailing P/E20.4045.60
Forward P/E0.0018.87
PEG Ratio1.56
Price / Sales1.691.24
Price / Book2.331.68
EV / EBITDA16.3110.65

Profitability

Metric603588CWY
Profit Margin5.69%2.94%
Operating Margin (TTM)11.05%6.66%
Return on Equity10.11%4.03%
Return on Assets3.79%3.05%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.800.05

Growth

Metric603588CWY
Revenue Growth (YoY)50.00%13.70%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-2.60%-49.20%

Dividends

Metric603588CWY
Dividend Yield0.64%2.91%
Dividend / Share0.100.07

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric603588CWY
Sortino (Composite)10.18-0.80
Sharpe (Composite)5.86-0.58
Calmar (Composite)18.17-1.38
Hurst Exponent0.59800.5380
Piotroski F-Score8/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#18,529#19,009

Ownership

Metric603588CWY
% Insiders3206.90%528.90%
% Institutions541.10%6998.10%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.