Home 603565 vs SFHOY 603565 vs SFHOY: Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd vs S.F. Holding Co. Ltd. ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd and S.F. Holding Co. Ltd. ADR are similar in size. 603565 trades at a lower P/E than SFHOY. SFHOY offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 603565 SFHOY Current Price CN¥11.65 $17.28 Daily Change -1.85% -6.09% 1-Year Return 13.77% — 52-Week High CN¥11.87 $27.54 52-Week Low CN¥9.42 $16.90 50-Day MA CN¥10.97 — 200-Day MA CN¥10.68 — Beta 0.62 0.60
Size & Revenue Metric 603565 SFHOY Market Cap $24.61B $26.31B Enterprise Value $23.05B $107.07B Revenue (TTM) $10.71B $302.82B Shares Outstanding 2.10B 60.00M Float 785.42M 2.49B Employees 1,532 —
Valuation Metric 603565 SFHOY Trailing P/E 11.60 13.64 Forward P/E 0.00 — Price / Sales 2.30 0.09 Price / Book 2.52 6.16 EV / EBITDA 7.40 4.69
Profitability Metric 603565 SFHOY Profit Margin 19.95% 3.59% Operating Margin (TTM) 24.14% 4.58% Return on Equity 21.14% 10.70% Return on Assets 5.21% 4.17% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.01 1.28
Growth Metric 603565 SFHOY Revenue Growth (YoY) -5.30% 8.20% Earnings Growth (YoY) -5.60% -8.50%
Dividends Metric 603565 SFHOY Dividend Yield 10.28% 148.00% Dividend / Share 1.22 0.26
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 603565 SFHOY Sortino (Composite) 4.45 -0.95 Sharpe (Composite) 2.62 -0.74 Calmar (Composite) 7.90 -2.92 Hurst Exponent 0.5198 0.4471 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 — Magic Formula Rank #7,901 —
Ownership Metric 603565 SFHOY % Insiders 6024.10% 0.00% % Institutions 956.00% 0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.