603565 vs MFT: Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd vs Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Sh
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603565•SHG
CN¥11.65
-1.85%
MF
NZ$57.72
+0.91%
Quick Summary
Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd is 3.6× the market cap of Mainfreight Limited Ordinary Sh. 603565 pays a dividend; MFT does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥11.65 | NZ$57.72 |
| Daily Change | -1.85% | 0.91% |
| 1-Year Return | 13.77% | 2.68% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥11.87 | NZ$69.57 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.42 | NZ$53.31 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥10.97 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥10.68 | — |
| Beta | 0.62 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $24.61B | $6.76B |
| Enterprise Value | $23.05B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.71B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.10B | — |
| Float | 785.42M | — |
| Employees | 1,532 | 11,130 |
Valuation
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 11.60 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 2.30 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.52 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.40 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 19.95% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.14% | — |
| Return on Equity | 21.14% | — |
| Return on Assets | 5.21% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 1.01 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.30% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -5.60% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 10.28% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.22 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 4.45 | -0.96 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.62 | -0.80 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 7.90 | -2.28 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5198 | 0.5358 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 5/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #7,901 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603565 | MFT |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6024.10% | — |
| % Institutions | 956.00% | — |
Compare 603565 to peers
Compare MFT to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.