Sign up for free insights newsletter

603565 vs INPOY: Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd vs InPost S.A

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥11.65
-1.85%
China
$24.61B
IN
INPOYUnited States
$8.83
-0.51%
United States
$8.79B

Quick Summary

Shanghai Zhonggu Logistics Co Ltd is 2.8× the market cap of InPost S.A. 603565 trades at a lower P/E than INPOY. 603565 pays a dividend; INPOY does not.

Price & Performance

Metric603565INPOY
Current PriceCN¥11.65$8.83
Daily Change-1.85%-0.51%
1-Year Return13.77%10.38%
52-Week HighCN¥11.87$9.09
52-Week LowCN¥9.42$5.32
50-Day MACN¥10.97
200-Day MACN¥10.68
Beta0.621.15

Size & Revenue

Metric603565INPOY
Market Cap$24.61B$8.79B
Enterprise Value$23.05B
Revenue (TTM)$10.71B
Shares Outstanding2.10B999.20M
Float785.42M226.12M
Employees1,532

Valuation

Metric603565INPOY
Trailing P/E11.6057.87
Forward P/E0.00
Price / Sales2.30
Price / Book2.521.41
EV / EBITDA7.40

Profitability

Metric603565INPOY
Profit Margin19.95%3.75%
Operating Margin (TTM)24.14%0.00%
Return on Equity21.14%18.68%
Return on Assets5.21%6.75%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.010.15

Growth

Metric603565INPOY
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.30%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-5.60%

Dividends

Metric603565INPOY
Dividend Yield10.28%
Dividend / Share1.22

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric603565INPOY
Sortino (Composite)4.493.22
Sharpe (Composite)2.641.40
Calmar (Composite)8.109.41
Hurst Exponent0.51980.6097
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#7,905

Ownership

Metric603565INPOY
% Insiders6024.10%0.00%
% Institutions956.00%0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.