603338 vs 6326: Zhejiang Dingli Mach Co Ltd vs KUBOTA CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603338•SHG
CN¥50.89
-1.03%
6326•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥2,571.00
-1.40%
Quick Summary
KUBOTA CORPORATION is 103.0× the market cap of Zhejiang Dingli Mach Co Ltd. 603338 pays a dividend; 6326 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥50.89 | ¥2,571.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.03% | -1.40% |
| 1-Year Return | 28.90% | 58.54% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥62.75 | ¥3,242.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥40.02 | ¥1,523.82 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥53.75 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥54.02 | — |
| Beta | 0.66 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.94B | $2.67T |
| Enterprise Value | $22.07B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.34B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 506.35M | — |
| Float | 221.19M | — |
| Employees | 2,531 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.68 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.56 | — |
| Price / Sales | 3.11 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.34 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.27 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.14% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.17% | — |
| Return on Equity | 16.80% | — |
| Return on Assets | 7.24% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 3.49 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.80% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -14.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.74 | 2.03 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 1.14 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.66 | 2.83 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6361 | 0.5535 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #6,864 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603338 | 6326 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5637.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 877.90% | — |
Compare 603338 to peers
Compare 6326 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.