603338 vs 6201: Zhejiang Dingli Mach Co Ltd vs TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
603338•SHG
CN¥50.89
-1.03%
6201•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥20,440.00
+0.05%
Quick Summary
TOYOTA INDUSTRIES CORPORATION is 229.7× the market cap of Zhejiang Dingli Mach Co Ltd. 603338 pays a dividend; 6201 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥50.89 | ¥20,440.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.03% | 0.05% |
| 1-Year Return | 28.90% | 59.69% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥62.75 | ¥20,590.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥40.02 | ¥12,750.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥53.75 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥54.02 | — |
| Beta | 0.66 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $25.94B | $5.96T |
| Enterprise Value | $22.07B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $8.34B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 506.35M | — |
| Float | 221.19M | — |
| Employees | 2,531 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.68 | — |
| Forward P/E | 14.56 | — |
| Price / Sales | 3.11 | — |
| Price / Book | 2.34 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.27 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 21.14% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 28.17% | — |
| Return on Equity | 16.80% | — |
| Return on Assets | 7.24% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 3.49 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.80% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -14.20% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.94% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 1.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 1.74 | 4.63 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.68 | 2.16 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.66 | 9.17 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6361 | 0.4868 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #6,864 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 603338 | 6201 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 5637.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 877.90% | — |
Compare 603338 to peers
Compare 6201 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.