601816 vs BEM: Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd vs BEM_BANGKOK EXPRESSWAY AND METR
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
CN¥4.93
+0.00%
THB 5.40
+2.86%
Quick Summary
Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd is 3.1× the market cap of BEM_BANGKOK EXPRESSWAY AND METR. 601816 pays a dividend; BEM does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.93 | THB 5.40 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | 2.86% |
| 1-Year Return | -17.42% | -7.50% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥6.02 | THB 6.13 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥4.84 | THB 4.53 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥5.00 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.17 | — |
| Beta | 0.22 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $240.71B | $78.63B |
| Enterprise Value | $278.84B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.61B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 48.93B | — |
| Float | 14.08B | — |
| Employees | 86 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 18.22 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.65 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.18 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.55 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 30.64% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 48.10% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.80% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.17% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.27 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 9.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.18% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.16 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.07 | 0.43 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.83 | 0.30 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.74 | 1.93 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4423 | 0.6499 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 9/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,977 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 601816 | BEM |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6497.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 2138.80% | — |
Compare 601816 to peers
Compare BEM to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.