601816 vs 9021: Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd vs West Japan Railway Company
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
CN¥4.93
+0.00%
9021•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,029.00
-0.49%
Quick Summary
West Japan Railway Company is 5.9× the market cap of Beijing-Shanghai High Speed Railway Co Ltd. 601816 pays a dividend; 9021 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.93 | ¥3,029.00 |
| Daily Change | 0.00% | -0.49% |
| 1-Year Return | -17.42% | 0.46% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥6.02 | ¥3,515.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥4.84 | ¥2,955.85 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥5.00 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.17 | — |
| Beta | 0.22 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $240.71B | $1.42T |
| Enterprise Value | $278.84B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42.61B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 48.93B | — |
| Float | 14.08B | — |
| Employees | 86 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 18.22 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.65 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.18 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.55 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 30.64% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 48.10% | — |
| Return on Equity | 5.80% | — |
| Return on Assets | 4.17% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.27 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 2.60% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 9.40% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 3.18% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.16 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.07 | -0.93 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.83 | -0.74 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.74 | -2.84 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4423 | 0.5259 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 9/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #15,977 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 601816 | 9021 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6497.20% | — |
| % Institutions | 2138.80% | — |
Compare 601816 to peers
Compare 9021 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.