Sign up for free insights newsletter

601800 vs SQU: China Communications Construction Co Ltd vs Vinci S. A.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥7.50
-1.19%
China
$121.70B
SQ
SQUXETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Germany
$76.21B

Quick Summary

China Communications Construction Co Ltd is 1.6× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 601800 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. SQU offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601800SQU
Current PriceCN¥7.50€137.55
Daily Change-1.19%2.27%
1-Year Return-19.44%14.86%
52-Week HighCN¥10.33€142.20
52-Week LowCN¥7.50€113.20
50-Day MACN¥7.94€133.07
200-Day MACN¥8.58€123.28
Beta0.520.79

Size & Revenue

Metric601800SQU
Market Cap$121.70B$76.21B
Enterprise Value$559.90B$95.14B
Revenue (TTM)$726.64B$75.70B
Shares Outstanding11.81B553.21M
Float6.54B477.50M
Employees137,471292,101

Valuation

Metric601800SQU
Trailing P/E5.8615.90
Forward P/E8.4814.99
PEG Ratio1.902.78
Price / Sales0.171.01
Price / Book0.372.47
EV / EBITDA8.036.97

Profitability

Metric601800SQU
Profit Margin2.06%6.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.56%13.14%
Return on Equity4.50%15.43%
Return on Assets1.16%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.288.65

Growth

Metric601800SQU
Revenue Growth (YoY)-9.60%5.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-94.50%6.80%

Dividends

Metric601800SQU
Dividend Yield2.57%3.72%
Dividend / Share0.205.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601800SQU
Sortino (Composite)-1.826.26
Sharpe (Composite)-1.442.57
Calmar (Composite)-3.752.43
Hurst Exponent0.54650.5565
Piotroski F-Score4/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#17,978#9,038

Ownership

Metric601800SQU
% Insiders8005.10%1210.50%
% Institutions619.70%5061.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.