Home 601727 vs ETN 601727 vs ETN: Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd vs Eaton Corporation PLC Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Eaton Corporation PLC is 1.3× the market cap of Shanghai Electric Group Co Ltd. ETN trades at a lower P/E than 601727. ETN pays a dividend; 601727 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 601727 ETN Current Price CN¥8.07 $406.21 Daily Change -0.74% 3.43% 1-Year Return 12.71% 51.39% 52-Week High CN¥10.77 $406.21 52-Week Low CN¥7.11 $259.47 50-Day MA CN¥8.56 $367.50 200-Day MA CN¥8.69 $358.58 Beta 0.58 1.16
Size & Revenue Metric 601727 ETN Market Cap $125.10B $156.53B Enterprise Value $114.80B $166.09B Revenue (TTM) $126.68B $23.20B Shares Outstanding 12.62B 387.99M Float 7.46B 387.25M Employees 43,074 97,303
Valuation Metric 601727 ETN Trailing P/E 100.63 38.60 Forward P/E 41.15 30.30 PEG Ratio 8.12 2.99 Price / Sales 0.99 5.70 Price / Book 2.31 8.05 EV / EBITDA 12.01 26.88
Profitability Metric 601727 ETN Profit Margin 0.95% 14.89% Operating Margin (TTM) 1.50% 19.97% Return on Equity 3.92% 21.53% Return on Assets 0.68% 8.33% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.08 8.06
Growth Metric 601727 ETN Revenue Growth (YoY) 12.20% 13.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) 8.60% 18.90%
Dividends Metric 601727 ETN Dividend Yield — 1.04% Dividend / Share — 4.16
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601727 ETN Sortino (Composite) 0.03 4.90 Sharpe (Composite) -0.12 2.79 Calmar (Composite) -1.29 14.93 Hurst Exponent 0.5730 0.6005 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,827 #13,500
Ownership Metric 601727 ETN % Insiders 6101.00% 6.50% % Institutions 75.10% 8541.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.