Sign up for free insights newsletter

601669 vs SQU: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs Vinci S. A.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥5.71
-0.17%
China
$98.36B
SQ
SQUXETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Germany
$76.21B

Quick Summary

Power Construction Corp of China Ltd is 1.3× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 601669 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. SQU offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601669SQU
Current PriceCN¥5.71€137.55
Daily Change-0.17%2.27%
1-Year Return19.71%14.86%
52-Week HighCN¥7.45€142.20
52-Week LowCN¥4.69€113.20
50-Day MACN¥5.78€133.07
200-Day MACN¥5.73€123.28
Beta0.200.79

Size & Revenue

Metric601669SQU
Market Cap$98.36B$76.21B
Enterprise Value$546.97B$95.14B
Revenue (TTM)$646.71B$75.70B
Shares Outstanding17.23B553.21M
Float8.09B477.50M
Employees163,912292,101

Valuation

Metric601669SQU
Trailing P/E10.2015.90
Forward P/E0.0014.99
PEG Ratio2.78
Price / Sales0.151.01
Price / Book0.582.47
EV / EBITDA16.576.97

Profitability

Metric601669SQU
Profit Margin1.66%6.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)3.62%13.14%
Return on Equity5.16%15.43%
Return on Assets1.37%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.568.65

Growth

Metric601669SQU
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.80%5.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-17.90%6.80%

Dividends

Metric601669SQU
Dividend Yield2.22%3.72%
Dividend / Share0.135.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601669SQU
Sortino (Composite)1.156.26
Sharpe (Composite)0.352.57
Calmar (Composite)-0.212.43
Hurst Exponent0.68370.5565
Piotroski F-Score5/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#22,387#9,038

Ownership

Metric601669SQU
% Insiders5368.70%1210.50%
% Institutions1069.90%5061.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.