Home 601669 vs FGR 601669 vs FGR: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs Eiffage SA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Power Construction Corp of China Ltd is 7.2× the market cap of Eiffage SA. 601669 trades at a lower P/E than FGR. FGR offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601669 FGR Current Price CN¥5.71 €142.70 Daily Change -0.17% 1.71% 1-Year Return 19.71% 25.67% 52-Week High CN¥7.45 €146.35 52-Week Low CN¥4.69 €104.40 50-Day MA CN¥5.78 €135.97 200-Day MA CN¥5.73 €120.86 Beta 0.20 0.76
Size & Revenue Metric 601669 FGR Market Cap $98.36B $13.62B Enterprise Value $546.97B $23.45B Revenue (TTM) $646.71B $26.12B Shares Outstanding 17.23B 96.25M Float 8.09B 72.92M Employees 163,912 87,000
Valuation Metric 601669 FGR Trailing P/E 10.20 13.22 Forward P/E 0.00 12.33 PEG Ratio — 2.13 Price / Sales 0.15 0.52 Price / Book 0.58 1.82 EV / EBITDA 16.57 5.46
Profitability Metric 601669 FGR Profit Margin 1.66% 3.91% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.62% 11.59% Return on Equity 5.16% 17.30% Return on Assets 1.37% 3.98% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.56 10.70
Growth Metric 601669 FGR Revenue Growth (YoY) 3.80% 9.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -17.90% 7.00%
Dividends Metric 601669 FGR Dividend Yield 2.22% 3.36% Dividend / Share 0.13 4.80
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601669 FGR Sortino (Composite) 1.15 5.84 Sharpe (Composite) 0.35 2.71 Calmar (Composite) -0.21 11.26 Hurst Exponent 0.6837 0.6469 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #22,387 #8,852
Ownership Metric 601669 FGR % Insiders 5368.70% 2015.50% % Institutions 1069.90% 4247.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.