Home 601669 vs EFGSY 601669 vs EFGSY: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs Eiffage SA ADR Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Power Construction Corp of China Ltd is 6.4× the market cap of Eiffage SA ADR. 601669 trades at a lower P/E than EFGSY. EFGSY offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601669 EFGSY Current Price CN¥5.71 $33.90 Daily Change -0.17% 0.00% 1-Year Return 19.71% 31.51% 52-Week High CN¥7.45 $35.58 52-Week Low CN¥4.69 $23.65 50-Day MA CN¥5.78 $31.20 200-Day MA CN¥5.73 $27.93 Beta 0.20 0.73
Size & Revenue Metric 601669 EFGSY Market Cap $98.36B $15.39B Enterprise Value $546.97B $26.19B Revenue (TTM) $646.71B $26.12B Shares Outstanding 17.23B 481.26M Float 8.09B 73.53M Employees 163,912 84,400
Valuation Metric 601669 EFGSY Trailing P/E 10.20 12.08 Forward P/E 0.00 11.31 PEG Ratio — 1.95 Price / Sales 0.15 0.59 Price / Book 0.58 1.71 EV / EBITDA 16.57 5.29
Profitability Metric 601669 EFGSY Profit Margin 1.66% 3.91% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.62% 11.32% Return on Equity 5.16% 17.22% Return on Assets 1.37% 3.92% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.56 2.54
Growth Metric 601669 EFGSY Revenue Growth (YoY) 3.80% 9.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -17.90% 11.60%
Dividends Metric 601669 EFGSY Dividend Yield 2.22% 15.08% Dividend / Share 0.13 4.80
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601669 EFGSY Sortino (Composite) 1.06 3.66 Sharpe (Composite) 0.28 2.93 Calmar (Composite) -0.42 13.77 Hurst Exponent 0.6837 0.6218 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #22,397 #9,834
Ownership Metric 601669 EFGSY % Insiders 5368.70% 0.00% % Institutions 1069.90% 0.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.