Home 601669 vs EFGSF 601669 vs EFGSF: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs Eiffage SA Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Power Construction Corp of China Ltd is 6.3× the market cap of Eiffage SA. 601669 trades at a lower P/E than EFGSF. EFGSF offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601669 EFGSF Current Price CN¥5.71 $152.26 Daily Change -0.17% 0.00% 1-Year Return 19.71% 34.61% 52-Week High CN¥7.45 $157.38 52-Week Low CN¥4.69 $129.11 50-Day MA CN¥5.78 $141.08 200-Day MA CN¥5.73 $136.34 Beta 0.20 0.73
Size & Revenue Metric 601669 EFGSF Market Cap $98.36B $15.58B Enterprise Value $546.97B $26.19B Revenue (TTM) $646.71B $26.12B Shares Outstanding 17.23B 96.25M Float 8.09B 73.53M Employees 163,912 84,400
Valuation Metric 601669 EFGSF Trailing P/E 10.20 12.39 Forward P/E 0.00 11.60 PEG Ratio — 2.00 Price / Sales 0.15 0.60 Price / Book 0.58 1.75 EV / EBITDA 16.57 5.29
Profitability Metric 601669 EFGSF Profit Margin 1.66% 3.91% Operating Margin (TTM) 3.62% 11.32% Return on Equity 5.16% 17.22% Return on Assets 1.37% 3.92% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.56 12.70
Growth Metric 601669 EFGSF Revenue Growth (YoY) 3.80% 9.30% Earnings Growth (YoY) -17.90% 11.60%
Dividends Metric 601669 EFGSF Dividend Yield 2.22% 3.05% Dividend / Share 0.13 4.80
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601669 EFGSF Sortino (Composite) 1.15 4.41 Sharpe (Composite) 0.35 1.56 Calmar (Composite) -0.21 13.25 Hurst Exponent 0.6837 0.5719 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #22,387 #9,618
Ownership Metric 601669 EFGSF % Insiders 5368.70% 2015.50% % Institutions 1069.90% 4217.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.