Sign up for free insights newsletter

601669 vs 601800: Power Construction Corp of China Ltd vs China Communications Construction Co Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in China.

CN¥5.71
-0.17%
China
$98.36B
CN¥7.50
-1.19%
China
$121.70B

Quick Summary

China Communications Construction Co Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of Power Construction Corp of China Ltd. 601800 trades at a lower P/E than 601669. 601800 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601669601800
Current PriceCN¥5.71CN¥7.50
Daily Change-0.17%-1.19%
1-Year Return19.71%-19.44%
52-Week HighCN¥7.45CN¥10.33
52-Week LowCN¥4.69CN¥7.50
50-Day MACN¥5.78CN¥7.94
200-Day MACN¥5.73CN¥8.58
Beta0.200.52

Size & Revenue

Metric601669601800
Market Cap$98.36B$121.70B
Enterprise Value$546.97B$559.90B
Revenue (TTM)$646.71B$726.64B
Shares Outstanding17.23B11.81B
Float8.09B6.54B
Employees163,912137,471

Valuation

Metric601669601800
Trailing P/E10.205.86
Forward P/E0.008.48
PEG Ratio1.90
Price / Sales0.150.17
Price / Book0.580.37
EV / EBITDA16.578.03

Profitability

Metric601669601800
Profit Margin1.66%2.06%
Operating Margin (TTM)3.62%5.56%
Return on Equity5.16%4.50%
Return on Assets1.37%1.16%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.561.28

Growth

Metric601669601800
Revenue Growth (YoY)3.80%-9.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-17.90%-94.50%

Dividends

Metric601669601800
Dividend Yield2.22%2.57%
Dividend / Share0.130.20

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601669601800
Sortino (Composite)1.15-1.82
Sharpe (Composite)0.35-1.44
Calmar (Composite)-0.21-3.75
Hurst Exponent0.68370.5465
Piotroski F-Score5/94/9
Magic Formula Rank#22,387#17,978

Ownership

Metric601669601800
% Insiders5368.70%8005.10%
% Institutions1069.90%619.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.