Sign up for free insights newsletter

601668 vs SQU: China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd vs Vinci S. A.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥4.94
-0.80%
China
$204.12B
SQ
SQUXETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Germany
$75.15B

Quick Summary

China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd is 2.7× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 601668 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. 601668 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601668SQU
Current PriceCN¥4.94€137.55
Daily Change-0.80%2.27%
1-Year Return-10.18%14.86%
52-Week HighCN¥6.13€142.20
52-Week LowCN¥4.88€113.20
50-Day MACN¥5.02€132.06
200-Day MACN¥5.34€123.05
Beta0.340.79

Size & Revenue

Metric601668SQU
Market Cap$204.12B$75.15B
Enterprise Value$754.31B$94.15B
Revenue (TTM)$2.12T$75.70B
Shares Outstanding41.32B553.46M
Float17.48B477.54M
Employees361,249292,101

Valuation

Metric601668SQU
Trailing P/E4.6215.69
Forward P/E0.0014.79
PEG Ratio2.74
Price / Sales0.100.99
Price / Book0.422.44
EV / EBITDA7.726.90

Profitability

Metric601668SQU
Profit Margin2.11%6.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)3.89%13.14%
Return on Equity7.50%15.43%
Return on Assets1.77%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)1.078.65

Growth

Metric601668SQU
Revenue Growth (YoY)-6.60%5.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-21.00%6.80%

Dividends

Metric601668SQU
Dividend Yield5.46%3.66%
Dividend / Share0.275.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601668SQU
Sortino (Composite)-0.706.26
Sharpe (Composite)-0.612.57
Calmar (Composite)-1.552.43
Hurst Exponent0.52770.5565
Piotroski F-Score3/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#13,312#9,038

Ownership

Metric601668SQU
% Insiders5912.50%1210.50%
% Institutions1107.90%5062.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.