Sign up for free insights newsletter

601618 vs EN: Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd vs Bouygues SA

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥2.98
-0.33%
China
$61.76B
Bouygues SA
ENEuronext Paris
€52.42
-0.19%
France
$20.18B

Quick Summary

Metallurgical Corporation of China Ltd is 3.1× the market cap of Bouygues SA. 601618 trades at a lower P/E than EN. EN offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601618EN
Current PriceCN¥2.98€52.42
Daily Change-0.33%-0.19%
1-Year Return0.68%40.39%
52-Week HighCN¥4.14€52.94
52-Week LowCN¥2.88€35.63
50-Day MACN¥3.07€50.46
200-Day MACN¥3.24€43.20
Beta1.090.71

Size & Revenue

Metric601618EN
Market Cap$61.76B$20.18B
Enterprise Value$64.72B$27.81B
Revenue (TTM)$434.76B$56.88B
Shares Outstanding17.85B384.97M
Float9.27B215.76M
Employees89,982196,184

Valuation

Metric601618EN
Trailing P/E0.0017.53
Forward P/E6.6415.92
PEG Ratio2.21
Price / Sales0.140.35
Price / Book0.401.55
EV / EBITDA4.894.83

Profitability

Metric601618EN
Profit Margin0.30%2.00%
Operating Margin (TTM)-3.24%4.01%
Return on Equity4.22%8.66%
Return on Assets0.96%2.22%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.002.99

Growth

Metric601618EN
Revenue Growth (YoY)-13.70%-1.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-59.10%22.10%

Dividends

Metric601618EN
Dividend Yield0.00%4.00%
Dividend / Share0.002.10

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601618EN
Sortino (Composite)-0.624.66
Sharpe (Composite)-0.492.49
Calmar (Composite)-1.3311.26
Hurst Exponent0.55200.5823
Piotroski F-Score6/96/9
Magic Formula Rank#10,487#13,884

Ownership

Metric601618EN
% Insiders6396.20%4334.10%
% Institutions646.20%2241.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.