601615 vs 6383: Ming Yang Smart Energy Group Ltd vs DAIFUKU CO.,LTD.
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
601615•SHG
CN¥16.93
+2.48%
6383•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥6,370.00
-1.65%
Quick Summary
DAIFUKU CO.,LTD. is 51.8× the market cap of Ming Yang Smart Energy Group Ltd. 601615 pays a dividend; 6383 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥16.93 | ¥6,370.00 |
| Daily Change | 2.48% | -1.65% |
| 1-Year Return | 68.46% | 83.53% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥25.85 | ¥6,578.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥9.92 | ¥3,414.78 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥20.19 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥16.07 | — |
| Beta | 0.90 | — |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $38.35B | $1.99T |
| Enterprise Value | $44.53B | — |
| Revenue (TTM) | $33.23B | — |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.26B | — |
| Float | 1.75B | — |
| Employees | 13,947 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 130.46 | — |
| Forward P/E | 11.74 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.15 | — |
| Price / Book | 1.42 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 61.63 | — |
Profitability
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.91% | — |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 3.76% | — |
| Return on Equity | 1.07% | — |
| Return on Assets | -0.03% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.13 | — |
Growth
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.50% | — |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 2.70% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 1.84% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.30 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.82 | 5.49 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.44 | 2.89 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.00 | 11.87 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6580 | 0.5674 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 2/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #27,338 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 601615 | 6383 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 2518.80% | — |
| % Institutions | 939.30% | — |
Compare 601615 to peers
Compare 6383 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.