Home 601611 vs ACA 601611 vs ACA: China Nuclear Engineering Co vs Arcosa Inc Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary China Nuclear Engineering Co is 8.3× the market cap of Arcosa Inc. ACA trades at a lower P/E than 601611. 601611 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 601611 ACA Current Price CN¥14.27 $114.48 Daily Change -0.97% 3.33% 1-Year Return 64.02% 47.93% 52-Week High CN¥19.94 $128.17 52-Week Low CN¥8.52 $74.99 50-Day MA CN¥15.38 $115.82 200-Day MA CN¥12.57 $100.53 Beta 0.68 0.98
Size & Revenue Metric 601611 ACA Market Cap $42.95B $5.18B Enterprise Value $115.86B $6.32B Revenue (TTM) $108.55B $2.31B Shares Outstanding 3.01B 49.04M Float 971.72M 48.11M Employees 45,686 6,390
Valuation Metric 601611 ACA Trailing P/E 28.50 24.92 Forward P/E 0.00 22.32 PEG Ratio — 1.40 Price / Sales 0.40 1.80 Price / Book 1.30 1.96 EV / EBITDA 22.23 11.33
Profitability Metric 601611 ACA Profit Margin 1.58% 7.23% Operating Margin (TTM) 4.88% 6.47% Return on Equity 5.39% 8.22% Return on Assets 1.30% 3.92% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.50 3.28
Growth Metric 601611 ACA Revenue Growth (YoY) -15.80% 7.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -27.40% 335.30%
Dividends Metric 601611 ACA Dividend Yield 0.72% 0.19% Dividend / Share 0.10 0.20
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 601611 ACA Sortino (Composite) 1.42 2.03 Sharpe (Composite) 0.81 1.22 Calmar (Composite) 0.78 5.51 Hurst Exponent 0.6356 0.5185 Piotroski F-Score 3/9 9/9 Magic Formula Rank #22,293 #15,499
Ownership Metric 601611 ACA % Insiders 6307.10% 186.30% % Institutions 1151.30% 9453.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.