Sign up for free insights newsletter

601390 vs SQU: China Railway Group Limited vs Vinci S. A.

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥5.32
+0.38%
China
$131.33B
SQ
SQUXETRA (Frankfurt)
€137.55
+2.27%
Germany
$76.21B

Quick Summary

China Railway Group Limited is 1.7× the market cap of Vinci S. A.. 601390 trades at a lower P/E than SQU. SQU offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric601390SQU
Current PriceCN¥5.32€137.55
Daily Change0.38%2.27%
1-Year Return-6.99%14.86%
52-Week HighCN¥6.30€142.20
52-Week LowCN¥5.20€113.20
50-Day MACN¥5.60€133.07
200-Day MACN¥5.61€123.28
Beta0.550.79

Size & Revenue

Metric601390SQU
Market Cap$131.33B$76.21B
Enterprise Value$435.21B$95.14B
Revenue (TTM)$1.09T$75.70B
Shares Outstanding20.48B553.21M
Float12.15B477.50M
Employees289,250292,101

Valuation

Metric601390SQU
Trailing P/E6.2615.90
Forward P/E4.8014.99
PEG Ratio1.482.78
Price / Sales0.121.01
Price / Book0.352.47
EV / EBITDA6.546.97

Profitability

Metric601390SQU
Profit Margin2.09%6.48%
Operating Margin (TTM)4.09%13.14%
Return on Equity5.02%15.43%
Return on Assets1.14%4.32%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.858.65

Growth

Metric601390SQU
Revenue Growth (YoY)-6.60%5.20%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-35.00%6.80%

Dividends

Metric601390SQU
Dividend Yield3.17%3.72%
Dividend / Share0.175.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601390SQU
Sortino (Composite)-0.666.26
Sharpe (Composite)1.842.57
Calmar (Composite)-1.282.43
Hurst Exponent0.50020.5565
Piotroski F-Score3/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#14,067#9,038

Ownership

Metric601390SQU
% Insiders6071.00%1210.50%
% Institutions1192.40%5061.00%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.