601155 vs GTWCF: Seazen Holdings Co Ltd vs Greentown China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
60
601155•SHG
CN¥14.71
+3.45%
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Seazen Holdings Co Ltd is 8.9× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Limited. GTWCF pays a dividend; 601155 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥14.71 | $1.45 |
| Daily Change | 3.45% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 7.06% | — |
| 52-Week High | CN¥18.08 | $1.45 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥12.20 | $1.45 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥15.52 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥15.15 | — |
| Beta | 1.82 | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $32.82B | $3.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $79.30B | $168.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $53.01B | $142.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.26B | 2.54B |
| Float | 736.39M | 1.02B |
| Employees | 19,935 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 48.50 | — |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.62 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 0.52 | 0.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.99 | 16.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 1.28% | -0.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.32% | 8.55% |
| Return on Equity | 0.55% | 1.79% |
| Return on Assets | 1.29% | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.30 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -50.20% | -23.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -43.30% | -89.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 288.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.11 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 5.16 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | 0.03 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6217 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #19,027 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 601155 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6943.40% | 59.96% |
| % Institutions | 707.10% | 10.70% |
Compare 601155 to peers
Compare GTWCF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.