Sign up for free insights newsletter

601106 vs IPGLF: China First Heavy Industries vs Interpump Group S.p.A

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥4.22
+0.72%
China
$28.94B
IP
IPGLFUnited States
$51.00
+0.00%
United States
$5.40B

Quick Summary

China First Heavy Industries is 5.4× the market cap of Interpump Group S.p.A. 601106 trades at a lower P/E than IPGLF. IPGLF pays a dividend; 601106 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric601106IPGLF
Current PriceCN¥4.22$51.00
Daily Change0.72%0.00%
1-Year Return62.31%8.60%
52-Week HighCN¥6.60$51.00
52-Week LowCN¥2.58$40.50
50-Day MACN¥4.66
200-Day MACN¥3.80
Beta0.671.23

Size & Revenue

Metric601106IPGLF
Market Cap$28.94B$5.40B
Enterprise Value$46.18B$5.73B
Revenue (TTM)$9.55B$2.07B
Shares Outstanding6.86B105.89M
Float2.48B77.05M
Employees0

Valuation

Metric601106IPGLF
Trailing P/E0.0022.87
Forward P/E153.85
Price / Sales3.032.61
Price / Book5.452.23
EV / EBITDA44.6012.53

Profitability

Metric601106IPGLF
Profit Margin-38.05%10.05%
Operating Margin (TTM)13.40%13.31%
Return on Equity-46.51%10.16%
Return on Assets-4.08%6.19%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-0.532.23

Growth

Metric601106IPGLF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-62.20%1.00%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-95.80%-22.90%

Dividends

Metric601106IPGLF
Dividend Yield73.00%
Dividend / Share0.37

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric601106IPGLF
Sortino (Composite)1.200.71
Sharpe (Composite)0.640.83
Calmar (Composite)2.720.75
Hurst Exponent0.62710.5184
Piotroski F-Score4/9

Ownership

Metric601106IPGLF
% Insiders6537.10%28.34%
% Institutions115.90%46.19%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.