601000 vs MIHDF: Tangshan Port Group Co Ltd vs MISC Berhad
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
601000•SHG
CN¥4.86
+0.83%
MI
MIHDF•United States
N/A
Quick Summary
Tangshan Port Group Co Ltd is 4.4× the market cap of MISC Berhad. 601000 trades at a lower P/E than MIHDF. 601000 pays a dividend; MIHDF does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.86 | — |
| Daily Change | 0.83% | — |
| 1-Year Return | 14.62% | — |
| 52-Week High | CN¥4.86 | — |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥3.80 | — |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥4.38 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥4.08 | — |
| Beta | 0.29 | 0.03 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $28.80B | $6.47B |
| Enterprise Value | $20.51B | $15.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.68B | $11.15B |
| Shares Outstanding | 5.93B | 4.46B |
| Float | 2.32B | 2.00B |
| Employees | 3,242 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 14.29 | 14.50 |
| Forward P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Price / Sales | 5.07 | 0.58 |
| Price / Book | 1.33 | 0.77 |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.88 | 3.17 |
Profitability
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 35.16% | 15.25% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 41.34% | 25.96% |
| Return on Equity | 9.57% | 4.76% |
| Return on Assets | 5.24% | 3.06% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.34 | 0.10 |
Growth
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 10.50% | -15.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 53.50% | — |
Dividends
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 4.15% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.20 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 6.32 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 2.90 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | 10.18 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5453 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #10,895 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 601000 | MIHDF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6231.80% | 54.46% |
| % Institutions | 845.30% | 37.67% |
Compare 601000 to peers
Compare MIHDF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.