Sign up for free insights newsletter

600879 vs RHM: China Aerospace Times Electronics Co Ltd vs Rheinmetall AG

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥23.42
+1.12%
China
$77.27B
Rheinmetall AG
RHMXETRA (Frankfurt)
€1,495.20
-0.13%
Germany
$69.25B

Quick Summary

China Aerospace Times Electronics Co Ltd is 1.1× the market cap of Rheinmetall AG. RHM trades at a lower P/E than 600879. RHM offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600879RHM
Current PriceCN¥23.42€1,495.20
Daily Change1.12%-0.13%
1-Year Return175.85%2.13%
52-Week HighCN¥31.56€1,988.50
52-Week LowCN¥8.18€1,339.50
50-Day MACN¥23.55€1,575.48
200-Day MACN¥16.60€1,690.11
Beta0.790.49

Size & Revenue

Metric600879RHM
Market Cap$77.27B$69.25B
Enterprise Value$77.52B$68.84B
Revenue (TTM)$13.88B$9.93B
Shares Outstanding3.30B46.31M
Float2.46B46.40M
Employees12,93631,923

Valuation

Metric600879RHM
Trailing P/E334.5767.11
Forward P/E40.1642.37
PEG Ratio0.75
Price / Sales5.576.97
Price / Book3.6613.82
EV / EBITDA68.3431.45

Profitability

Metric600879RHM
Profit Margin1.41%7.01%
Operating Margin (TTM)3.25%16.81%
Return on Equity0.82%23.34%
Return on Assets0.40%6.71%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.0722.28

Growth

Metric600879RHM
Revenue Growth (YoY)98.00%13.30%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-88.80%8.50%

Dividends

Metric600879RHM
Dividend Yield0.00%0.77%
Dividend / Share0.0011.50

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600879RHM
Sortino (Composite)5.760.45
Sharpe (Composite)3.180.23
Calmar (Composite)8.410.32
Hurst Exponent0.67620.6083
Piotroski F-Score2/97/9
Magic Formula Rank#28,048

Ownership

Metric600879RHM
% Insiders2671.00%166.20%
% Institutions1110.10%4499.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.