Home 600875 vs ETN 600875 vs ETN: Dongfang Electric Corp Ltd Class A vs Eaton Corporation PLC Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Dongfang Electric Corp Ltd Class A and Eaton Corporation PLC are similar in size. 600875 trades at a lower P/E than ETN. 600875 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600875 ETN Current Price CN¥41.72 $406.21 Daily Change -0.76% 3.43% 1-Year Return 172.86% 51.39% 52-Week High CN¥44.22 $406.21 52-Week Low CN¥15.17 $259.47 50-Day MA CN¥36.27 $367.50 200-Day MA CN¥25.23 $358.58 Beta 0.70 1.16
Size & Revenue Metric 600875 ETN Market Cap $144.28B $156.53B Enterprise Value $124.89B $166.09B Revenue (TTM) $77.58B $23.20B Shares Outstanding 3.05B 387.99M Float 1.67B 387.25M Employees 18,753 97,303
Valuation Metric 600875 ETN Trailing P/E 36.28 38.60 Forward P/E 18.08 30.30 PEG Ratio 3.18 2.99 Price / Sales 1.86 5.70 Price / Book 3.21 8.05 EV / EBITDA 20.79 26.88
Profitability Metric 600875 ETN Profit Margin 4.94% 14.89% Operating Margin (TTM) -3.07% 19.97% Return on Equity 8.69% 21.53% Return on Assets 1.08% 8.33% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.15 8.06
Growth Metric 600875 ETN Revenue Growth (YoY) 5.90% 13.10% Earnings Growth (YoY) 159.80% 18.90%
Dividends Metric 600875 ETN Dividend Yield 1.26% 1.04% Dividend / Share 0.53 4.16
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600875 ETN Sortino (Composite) 12.67 4.90 Sharpe (Composite) 5.21 2.79 Calmar (Composite) 17.64 14.93 Hurst Exponent 0.6435 0.6005 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #14,825 #13,500
Ownership Metric 600875 ETN % Insiders 5862.20% 6.50% % Institutions 863.90% 8541.20%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.