Home 600692 vs HOEGF 600692 vs HOEGF: Shang Hai Ya Tong Co Ltd vs HÖEgh Autoliners AS Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Shang Hai Ya Tong Co Ltd and HÖEgh Autoliners AS are similar in size. 600692 trades at a lower P/E than HOEGF. HOEGF pays a dividend; 600692 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 600692 HOEGF Current Price CN¥7.36 $14.35 Daily Change -2.13% 0.00% 1-Year Return 0.00% 99.86% 52-Week High CN¥9.07 $15.00 52-Week Low CN¥6.70 $7.18 50-Day MA CN¥7.75 — 200-Day MA CN¥7.91 — Beta 0.64 0.34
Size & Revenue Metric 600692 HOEGF Market Cap $2.87B $2.74B Enterprise Value $2.23B $3.34B Revenue (TTM) $496.56M $1.43B Shares Outstanding 351.76M 190.77M Float 237.42M 121.31M Employees 488 —
Valuation Metric 600692 HOEGF Trailing P/E 0.00 5.28 Forward P/E 77.52 — Price / Sales 5.79 1.92 Price / Book 3.11 2.13 EV / EBITDA 59.96 5.59
Profitability Metric 600692 HOEGF Profit Margin -2.90% 36.02% Operating Margin (TTM) -5.09% 31.96% Return on Equity -0.69% 41.88% Return on Assets -0.12% 13.79% Diluted EPS (TTM) -0.04 2.69
Growth Metric 600692 HOEGF Revenue Growth (YoY) -58.30% 1.70% Earnings Growth (YoY) -96.40% -24.30%
Dividends Metric 600692 HOEGF Dividend Yield — 1574.00% Dividend / Share — 2.24
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600692 HOEGF Sortino (Composite) -0.56 5.77 Sharpe (Composite) -0.39 3.24 Calmar (Composite) -2.24 9.01 Hurst Exponent 0.5389 0.5627 Piotroski F-Score 6/9 — Magic Formula Rank #29,373 —
Ownership Metric 600692 HOEGF % Insiders 3509.60% 46.33% % Institutions 93.30% 22.59%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.