Home 600582 vs CYJBY 600582 vs CYJBY: Tian Di Science & Technology Co Ltd vs Cargotec Corporation Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary Tian Di Science & Technology Co Ltd is 7.5× the market cap of Cargotec Corporation. 600582 trades at a lower P/E than CYJBY. 600582 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600582 CYJBY Current Price CN¥5.71 $27.13 Daily Change -0.52% 0.00% 1-Year Return -6.55% -15.07% 52-Week High CN¥6.51 $34.89 52-Week Low CN¥5.66 $24.39 50-Day MA CN¥5.94 $27.21 200-Day MA CN¥6.02 $29.38 Beta 0.44 1.08
Size & Revenue Metric 600582 CYJBY Market Cap $23.67B $3.15B Enterprise Value $15.91B $2.95B Revenue (TTM) $29.24B $1.56B Shares Outstanding 4.14B 109.99M Float 1.61B 44.76M Employees 17,431 3,916
Valuation Metric 600582 CYJBY Trailing P/E 9.69 18.07 Forward P/E 10.38 5.93 PEG Ratio 0.44 — Price / Sales 0.81 2.03 Price / Book 0.93 2.70 EV / EBITDA 2.84 9.47
Profitability Metric 600582 CYJBY Profit Margin 8.37% 10.54% Operating Margin (TTM) 0.66% 10.49% Return on Equity 12.02% 14.84% Return on Assets 1.46% 6.35% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.59 1.35
Growth Metric 600582 CYJBY Revenue Growth (YoY) 2.70% -3.90% Earnings Growth (YoY) -75.90% -28.60%
Dividends Metric 600582 CYJBY Dividend Yield 5.23% 4.80% Dividend / Share 0.30 1.17
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600582 CYJBY Sortino (Composite) -0.38 3.05 Sharpe (Composite) -0.44 0.53 Calmar (Composite) -1.92 13.00 Hurst Exponent 0.5374 0.5497 Piotroski F-Score 3/9 8/9 Magic Formula Rank #16,465 #8,291
Ownership Metric 600582 CYJBY % Insiders 6166.80% 0.00% % Institutions 571.90% 0.50%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.