Home 600482 vs ATLPF 600482 vs ATLPF: China Shipbuilding Industry Group Power Co Ltd vs Atlas Copco AB Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
Quick Summary China Shipbuilding Industry Group Power Co Ltd and Atlas Copco AB are similar in size. ATLPF trades at a lower P/E than 600482. 600482 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 600482 ATLPF Current Price CN¥38.21 $20.64 Daily Change -2.03% 4.85% 1-Year Return 86.39% 31.31% 52-Week High CN¥41.20 $22.26 52-Week Low CN¥19.47 $14.67 50-Day MA CN¥33.12 $19.49 200-Day MA CN¥25.08 $17.83 Beta 0.68 1.05
Size & Revenue Metric 600482 ATLPF Market Cap $86.62B $93.05B Enterprise Value $52.62B $92.61B Revenue (TTM) $56.05B $171.55B Shares Outstanding 2.27B 3.32B Float 1.05B 3.94B Employees 24,499 56,356
Valuation Metric 600482 ATLPF Trailing P/E 47.74 32.90 Forward P/E 27.03 27.93 PEG Ratio — 3.05 Price / Sales 1.55 5.15 Price / Book 2.20 7.88 EV / EBITDA 11.81 19.53
Profitability Metric 600482 ATLPF Profit Margin 3.31% 15.69% Operating Margin (TTM) 7.53% 0.00% Return on Equity 7.38% 23.58% Return on Assets 1.97% 10.71% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.80 0.58
Growth Metric 600482 ATLPF Revenue Growth (YoY) 13.30% -7.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) 2.40% -15.00%
Dividends Metric 600482 ATLPF Dividend Yield 0.69% 0.00% Dividend / Share 0.27 0.00
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600482 ATLPF Sortino (Composite) 10.52 0.96 Sharpe (Composite) 5.51 6.47 Calmar (Composite) 8.81 1.17 Hurst Exponent 0.5976 0.5595 Piotroski F-Score 7/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #18,720 #2,544
Ownership Metric 600482 ATLPF % Insiders 5760.00% 0.20% % Institutions 1160.40% 6673.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.