Sign up for free insights newsletter

600383 vs SNLAF: Gemdale Corp vs Sino Land Company Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

60
600383SHG
CN¥2.84
+1.07%
China
$12.82B
SN
SNLAFUnited States
$1.34
+0.00%
United States
$12.52B

Quick Summary

Gemdale Corp and Sino Land Company Limited are similar in size. 600383 trades at a lower P/E than SNLAF. SNLAF pays a dividend; 600383 does not.

Price & Performance

Metric600383SNLAF
Current PriceCN¥2.84$1.34
Daily Change1.07%0.00%
1-Year Return-43.31%
52-Week HighCN¥5.06$1.34
52-Week LowCN¥2.59$1.32
50-Day MACN¥3.06
200-Day MACN¥3.57
Beta1.230.51

Size & Revenue

Metric600383SNLAF
Market Cap$12.82B$12.52B
Enterprise Value$67.83B$-35.07B
Revenue (TTM)$58.27B$9.51B
Shares Outstanding4.51B9.48B
Float2.80B3.69B
Employees37,389

Valuation

Metric600383SNLAF
Trailing P/E0.0026.40
Forward P/E4.04
PEG Ratio0.24
Price / Sales0.221.32
Price / Book0.280.58
EV / EBITDA53.37-10.71

Profitability

Metric600383SNLAF
Profit Margin-12.34%39.23%
Operating Margin (TTM)-9.31%31.07%
Return on Equity-7.98%2.20%
Return on Assets-0.16%1.08%
Diluted EPS (TTM)-2.940.05

Growth

Metric600383SNLAF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-58.20%34.50%
Earnings Growth (YoY)281.80%-15.80%

Dividends

Metric600383SNLAF
Dividend Yield563.00%
Dividend / Share0.07

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600383SNLAF
Sortino (Composite)-0.61
Sharpe (Composite)-0.74
Calmar (Composite)3.60
Hurst Exponent0.6259
Piotroski F-Score5/9
Magic Formula Rank#27,079

Ownership

Metric600383SNLAF
% Insiders914.40%60.98%
% Institutions3872.00%10.19%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.