600376 vs GTWCF: Beijing Capital Development Co Ltd vs Greentown China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
60
600376•SHG
CN¥4.88
+1.67%
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Beijing Capital Development Co Ltd is 3.4× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Limited. GTWCF pays a dividend; 600376 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.88 | $1.45 |
| Daily Change | 1.67% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 95.98% | — |
| 52-Week High | CN¥8.07 | $1.45 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥2.32 | $1.45 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥5.33 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.24 | — |
| Beta | 1.66 | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.59B | $3.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $96.84B | $168.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $32.94B | $142.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 2.58B | 2.54B |
| Float | 1.22B | 1.02B |
| Employees | 2,197 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 4.24 | — |
| PEG Ratio | 2.92 | — |
| Price / Sales | 0.38 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 0.93 | 0.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.93 | 16.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -21.14% | -0.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -1.69% | 8.55% |
| Return on Equity | -14.40% | 1.79% |
| Return on Assets | -0.90% | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -2.78 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -9.20% | -23.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -8.00% | -89.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 288.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 0.80 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 0.34 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | 5.71 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6086 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 4/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 600376 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 6153.10% | 59.96% |
| % Institutions | 396.10% | 10.70% |
Compare 600376 to peers
Compare GTWCF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.