600279 vs SEMUF: Chongqing Gangjiu Co Ltd vs Siem Industries S.A
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
60
600279•SHG
CN¥4.92
-0.40%
SE
SEMUF•United States
$46.00
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Chongqing Gangjiu Co Ltd is 7.9× the market cap of Siem Industries S.A.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥4.92 | $46.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.40% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | -6.46% | 100.44% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥6.92 | $50.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥4.91 | $22.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥5.29 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥5.41 | — |
| Beta | 0.41 | 0.18 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $5.84B | $742.21M |
| Enterprise Value | $7.88B | $1.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.20B | $224.73M |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.19B | 14.99M |
| Float | 401.73M | 2.90M |
| Employees | 2,556 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 123.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 21.60 | — |
| Price / Sales | 1.39 | 3.30 |
| Price / Book | 0.87 | 0.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 11.56 | 40.48 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 11.96% | -1.07% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.16% | 30.72% |
| Return on Equity | 10.17% | — |
| Return on Assets | 0.64% | — |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.04 | -11.90 |
Growth
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -19.50% | -48.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 170.20% | -66.60% |
Dividends
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | 0.00% | — |
| Dividend / Share | 0.00 | — |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -1.08 | 3.97 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.80 | 1.47 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -1.64 | 7.39 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5435 | 0.4710 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 6/9 | — |
| Magic Formula Rank | #23,236 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 600279 | SEMUF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7006.90% | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | 47.70% | 0.03% |
Compare 600279 to peers
Compare SEMUF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.