600246 vs GTWCF: Beijing Vantone Real Estate Co Ltd vs Greentown China Holdings Limited
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.
60
600246•SHG
CN¥9.69
-0.10%
GT
GTWCF•United States
$1.45
+0.00%
Quick Summary
Beijing Vantone Real Estate Co Ltd is 5.1× the market cap of Greentown China Holdings Limited. GTWCF pays a dividend; 600246 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥9.69 | $1.45 |
| Daily Change | -0.10% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 81.80% | — |
| 52-Week High | CN¥14.99 | $1.45 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥5.18 | $1.45 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥10.69 | — |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥11.35 | — |
| Beta | 1.08 | 0.67 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $18.75B | $3.68B |
| Enterprise Value | $19.56B | $168.50B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $480.43M | $142.35B |
| Shares Outstanding | 1.94B | 2.54B |
| Float | 1.49B | 1.02B |
| Employees | 167 | — |
Valuation
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 0.00 | — |
| Forward P/E | 9.23 | — |
| Price / Sales | 39.03 | 0.03 |
| Price / Book | 3.59 | 0.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | -65.16 | 16.25 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | -75.10% | -0.17% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -19.95% | 8.55% |
| Return on Equity | -6.17% | 1.79% |
| Return on Assets | -0.78% | 1.16% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | -0.19 | -0.01 |
Growth
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 34.90% | -23.30% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | 7054.80% | -89.70% |
Dividends
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 288.00% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.04 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.40 | — |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.38 | — |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.04 | — |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5267 | — |
| Piotroski F-Score | 7/9 | — |
Ownership
| Metric | 600246 | GTWCF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 3510.90% | 59.96% |
| % Institutions | 970.30% | 10.70% |
Compare 600246 to peers
Compare GTWCF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.