Home 600233 vs 9699 600233 vs 9699: YTO Express Group Co Ltd vs Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
96
9699 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary YTO Express Group Co Ltd is 7.0× the market cap of Hangzhou Sf Intra City Industrial Co Ltd. 600233 trades at a lower P/E than 9699. 600233 pays a dividend; 9699 does not.
Price & Performance Metric 600233 9699 Current Price CN¥21.04 HK$11.28 Daily Change -1.82% -1.05% 1-Year Return 60.24% 41.18% 52-Week High CN¥21.50 HK$18.94 52-Week Low CN¥12.51 HK$7.89 50-Day MA CN¥19.30 HK$12.52 200-Day MA CN¥17.55 HK$13.37 Beta 0.32 1.64
Size & Revenue Metric 600233 9699 Market Cap $72.01B $10.35B Enterprise Value $73.33B $7.33B Revenue (TTM) $73.82B $22.90B Shares Outstanding 3.42B 742.49M Float 1.50B 276.76M Employees 19,497 2,067
Valuation Metric 600233 9699 Trailing P/E 18.30 33.29 Forward P/E 12.67 0.00 PEG Ratio 0.75 — Price / Sales 0.98 0.45 Price / Book 2.20 2.75 EV / EBITDA 14.75 20.70
Profitability Metric 600233 9699 Profit Margin 5.36% 1.21% Operating Margin (TTM) 7.50% 1.25% Return on Equity 12.07% 8.90% Return on Assets 6.28% 3.43% Diluted EPS (TTM) 1.15 0.23
Growth Metric 600233 9699 Revenue Growth (YoY) 8.70% 42.80% Earnings Growth (YoY) 11.20% 93.90%
Dividends Metric 600233 9699 Dividend Yield 1.68% — Dividend / Share 0.36 —
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 600233 9699 Sortino (Composite) 4.90 -0.22 Sharpe (Composite) 3.86 -0.22 Calmar (Composite) 12.69 -1.82 Hurst Exponent 0.5755 0.6246 Piotroski F-Score 4/9 6/9 Magic Formula Rank #10,305 #17,027
Ownership Metric 600233 9699 % Insiders 5559.10% 6638.60% % Institutions 956.90% 414.30%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.