600029 vs UAL: China Southern Airlines Co Ltd Class A vs United Airlines Holdings Inc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
600029•SHG
CN¥5.71
-0.87%
MX$1,797.91
+8.89%
Quick Summary
United Airlines Holdings Inc is 5.1× the market cap of China Southern Airlines Co Ltd Class A. UAL trades at a lower P/E than 600029.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | CN¥5.71 | MX$1,797.91 |
| Daily Change | -0.87% | 8.89% |
| 1-Year Return | -1.21% | 36.18% |
| 52-Week High | CN¥8.29 | MX$2,080.00 |
| 52-Week Low | CN¥5.61 | MX$1,290.00 |
| 50-Day MA | CN¥6.61 | MX$1,757.52 |
| 200-Day MA | CN¥6.63 | MX$1,823.77 |
| Beta | 0.51 | 1.29 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $103.47B | $527.98B |
| Enterprise Value | $296.11B | $871.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $182.26B | $59.07B |
| Shares Outstanding | 13.48B | 324.65M |
| Float | 5.43B | 320.60M |
| Employees | 108,176 | 113,200 |
Valuation
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | 114.20 | 9.21 |
| Forward P/E | 65.79 | 8.67 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.09 | 6.49 |
| Price / Sales | 0.57 | 8.94 |
| Price / Book | 2.93 | 2.07 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.14 | 5.99 |
Profitability
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | 0.47% | 5.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -1.02% | 9.14% |
| Return on Equity | 4.99% | 23.99% |
| Return on Assets | 1.61% | 4.23% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | 0.05 | 176.55 |
Growth
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.70% | 4.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | -4.80% | 8.10% |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.66 | 0.65 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.50 | 0.34 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.16 | 2.14 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5874 | 0.5671 |
| Piotroski F-Score | 8/9 | 7/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | #21,563 | #20,423 |
Ownership
| Metric | 600029 | UAL |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | 7276.60% | 62.90% |
| % Institutions | 824.10% | 9053.40% |
Compare 600029 to peers
Compare UAL to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.