Sign up for free insights newsletter

600004 vs EENNF: Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Co Ltd vs ENAV S.p.A

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

CN¥8.88
-0.45%
China
$22.89B
EE
EENNFUnited States
$3.52
+0.00%
United States
$1.90B

Quick Summary

Guangzhou Baiyun International Airport Co Ltd is 12.0× the market cap of ENAV S.p.A. EENNF trades at a lower P/E than 600004. EENNF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric600004EENNF
Current PriceCN¥8.88$3.52
Daily Change-0.45%0.00%
1-Year Return0.11%0.00%
52-Week HighCN¥10.33$3.52
52-Week LowCN¥8.79$3.52
50-Day MACN¥9.16$3.52
200-Day MACN¥9.49$3.52
Beta0.260.62

Size & Revenue

Metric600004EENNF
Market Cap$22.89B$1.90B
Enterprise Value$18.34B$3.49B
Revenue (TTM)$7.82B$989.17M
Shares Outstanding2.58B540.33M
Float1.12B252.83M
Employees9,9014,547

Valuation

Metric600004EENNF
Trailing P/E15.5815.30
Forward P/E42.0239.06
Price / Sales2.931.92
Price / Book1.211.42
EV / EBITDA9.5914.61

Profitability

Metric600004EENNF
Profit Margin17.31%10.39%
Operating Margin (TTM)23.12%54.93%
Return on Equity7.39%8.83%
Return on Assets3.48%3.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.570.23

Growth

Metric600004EENNF
Revenue Growth (YoY)7.10%-2.50%
Earnings Growth (YoY)40.10%-1.10%

Dividends

Metric600004EENNF
Dividend Yield1.76%7.67%
Dividend / Share0.160.27

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric600004EENNF
Sortino (Composite)-0.99
Sharpe (Composite)-0.740.98
Calmar (Composite)-2.02
Hurst Exponent0.61360.5394
Piotroski F-Score8/97/9
Magic Formula Rank#14,677#12,231

Ownership

Metric600004EENNF
% Insiders6130.10%5328.00%
% Institutions495.50%1915.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.