5801 vs 603728: Furukawa Electric Co.,Ltd. vs Shanghai Moons' Elec Co Ltd
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
5801•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥44,960.00
-1.66%
60
603728•SHG
CN¥59.66
+0.61%
Quick Summary
Furukawa Electric Co.,Ltd. is 39.9× the market cap of Shanghai Moons' Elec Co Ltd. 603728 pays a dividend; 5801 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥44,960.00 | CN¥59.66 |
| Daily Change | -1.66% | 0.61% |
| 1-Year Return | 982.59% | 5.44% |
| 52-Week High | ¥46,880.00 | CN¥84.64 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥4,020.00 | CN¥53.94 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥63.44 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥67.22 |
| Beta | — | 0.73 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $982.76B | $24.64B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $24.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $2.63B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 418.88M |
| Float | — | 140.11M |
| Employees | — | 3,463 |
Valuation
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 309.58 |
| Forward P/E | — | 0.00 |
| Price / Sales | — | 9.37 |
| Price / Book | — | 8.38 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 268.47 |
Profitability
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.06% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 3.40% |
| Return on Equity | — | 2.79% |
| Return on Assets | — | 0.39% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.19 |
Growth
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 29.00% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 216.50% |
Dividends
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.04% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.02 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 33.01 | 5.31 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 16.44 | 1.29 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 42.66 | 1.00 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5790 | 0.6111 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #27,257 |
Ownership
| Metric | 5801 | 603728 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6564.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 786.70% |
Compare 5801 to peers
Compare 603728 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.