Sign up for free insights newsletter

5522 vs CRBJF: Farglory Land Development Co Ltd vs China Resources Land Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Real Estate sector.

NT$69.70
-1.13%
Taiwan
$55.10B
CR
CRBJFUnited States
$3.80
+0.00%
United States
$28.38B

Quick Summary

Farglory Land Development Co Ltd is 1.9× the market cap of China Resources Land Ltd. CRBJF trades at a lower P/E than 5522. CRBJF offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric5522CRBJF
Current PriceNT$69.70$3.80
Daily Change-1.13%0.00%
1-Year Return16.56%
52-Week HighNT$81.40$3.98
52-Week LowNT$53.20$3.80
50-Day MANT$68.73
200-Day MANT$64.71
Beta-0.05

Size & Revenue

Metric5522CRBJF
Market Cap$55.10B$28.38B
Enterprise Value$77.50B$374.32B
Revenue (TTM)$31.15B$281.44B
Shares Outstanding781.60M7.13B
Float207.80M2.89B
Employees0

Valuation

Metric5522CRBJF
Trailing P/E9.487.37
Forward P/E5.91
PEG Ratio2.95
Price / Sales1.770.10
Price / Book1.080.68
EV / EBITDA9.738.09

Profitability

Metric5522CRBJF
Profit Margin18.70%9.03%
Operating Margin (TTM)26.38%14.59%
Return on Equity12.03%8.04%
Return on Assets4.54%2.56%
Diluted EPS (TTM)7.440.54

Growth

Metric5522CRBJF
Revenue Growth (YoY)349.50%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)540.10%-11.70%

Dividends

Metric5522CRBJF
Dividend Yield7.85%462.00%
Dividend / Share5.500.18

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric5522CRBJF
Sortino (Composite)0.82
Sharpe (Composite)0.32
Calmar (Composite)-0.74
Hurst Exponent0.6360
Piotroski F-Score8/9
Magic Formula Rank#7,865

Ownership

Metric5522CRBJF
% Insiders6561.90%59.55%
% Institutions2138.20%17.75%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.