5273 vs FORN: MITANI SEKISAN CO.,LTD. vs Forbo Holding AG
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
52
5273•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,768.00
-1.72%
FO
FORN•SIX Swiss Exchange
CHF 766.00
+3.51%
Quick Summary
MITANI SEKISAN CO.,LTD. is 126.1× the market cap of Forbo Holding AG. FORN pays a dividend; 5273 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,768.00 | CHF 766.00 |
| Daily Change | -1.72% | 3.51% |
| 1-Year Return | -74.49% | 3.23% |
| 52-Week High | ¥9,350.00 | CHF 964.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,740.00 | CHF 682.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CHF 819.44 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CHF 806.49 |
| Beta | — | 0.88 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $133.83B | $1.06B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $989.14M |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $1.09B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.42M |
| Float | — | 874,828 |
| Employees | — | 4,716 |
Valuation
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 15.33 |
| Forward P/E | — | 14.43 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 8.17 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.98 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.66 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 7.08 |
Profitability
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 6.35% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 8.17% |
| Return on Equity | — | 10.80% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.58% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 48.78 |
Growth
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | -2.40% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -24.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.29% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 25.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.90 | 1.39 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.86 | 0.47 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -2.63 | 3.65 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.5373 | 0.6238 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #9,345 |
Ownership
| Metric | 5273 | FORN |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 3193.30% |
| % Institutions | — | 4008.20% |
Compare 5273 to peers
Compare FORN to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.