4901 vs KLKBY: FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation vs Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
4901•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,166.00
-0.53%
KL
KLKBY•United States
$5.50
+0.00%
Quick Summary
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation is 275.5× the market cap of Kuala Lumpur Kepong Berhad. KLKBY pays a dividend; 4901 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,166.00 | $5.50 |
| Daily Change | -0.53% | 0.00% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.61% | 28.35% |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,770.00 | $5.50 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,676.00 | $2.07 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $3.79 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $4.08 |
| Beta | — | 0.13 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.77T | $13.67B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $8.23B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $25.42B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 1.11B |
| Float | — | 526.49M |
| Employees | — | 38,467 |
Valuation
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 25.00 |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.12 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 0.39 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.54 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.76 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 10.84 |
Profitability
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 3.85% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 11.21% |
| Return on Equity | — | 7.59% |
| Return on Assets | — | 4.42% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 0.22 |
Growth
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 6.80% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 70.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 10.91% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.60 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.65 | 0.47 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.57 | 0.14 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.14 | 0.47 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6173 | 0.5551 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #8,564 |
Ownership
| Metric | 4901 | KLKBY |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 0.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 0.00% |
Compare 4901 to peers
Compare KLKBY to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.