4901 vs HLMAF: FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation vs Halma plc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
4901•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,166.00
-0.53%
HL
HLMAF•United States
$61.71
+2.15%
Quick Summary
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation is 191.4× the market cap of Halma plc. HLMAF pays a dividend; 4901 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,166.00 | $61.71 |
| Daily Change | -0.53% | 2.15% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.61% | 80.02% |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,770.00 | $61.71 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,676.00 | $34.51 |
| 50-Day MA | — | $51.09 |
| 200-Day MA | — | $46.49 |
| Beta | — | 0.92 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.77T | $19.67B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $20.41B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $2.41B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 377.70M |
| Float | — | 373.11M |
| Employees | — | 9,000 |
Valuation
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 42.69 |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.58 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 2.85 |
| Price / Sales | — | 8.16 |
| Price / Book | — | 7.39 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 25.23 |
Profitability
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 14.39% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 20.50% |
| Return on Equity | — | 18.61% |
| Return on Assets | — | 9.65% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.22 |
Growth
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 15.20% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 37.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 0.44% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 0.24 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.65 | 13.95 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.57 | 7.08 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.14 | 5.82 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6173 | 0.5546 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 8/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #15,715 |
Ownership
| Metric | 4901 | HLMAF |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 108.00% |
| % Institutions | — | 5677.70% |
Compare 4901 to peers
Compare HLMAF to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.