4901 vs AKER: FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation vs Aker ASA
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
4901•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥3,166.00
-0.53%
AKER•Oslo Stock Exchange
NOK 1,026.00
-4.82%
Quick Summary
FUJIFILM Holdings Corporation is 48.5× the market cap of Aker ASA. AKER pays a dividend; 4901 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥3,166.00 | NOK 1,026.00 |
| Daily Change | -0.53% | -4.82% |
| 1-Year Return | 16.61% | 76.59% |
| 52-Week High | ¥3,770.00 | NOK 1,102.00 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥2,676.00 | NOK 582.00 |
| 50-Day MA | — | NOK 997.06 |
| 200-Day MA | — | NOK 809.39 |
| Beta | — | 0.23 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.77T | $77.56B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $119.02B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $18.36B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 74.29M |
| Float | — | 21.81M |
| Employees | — | 3,102 |
Valuation
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 19.17 |
| Forward P/E | — | 232.56 |
| PEG Ratio | — | 1.88 |
| Price / Sales | — | 4.22 |
| Price / Book | — | 1.69 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.84 |
Profitability
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 21.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 27.58% |
| Return on Equity | — | 4.37% |
| Return on Assets | — | 3.04% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 54.47 |
Growth
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 12.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | 0.00% |
Dividends
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 2.72% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 29.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | 3.65 | 5.90 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | 1.57 | 2.96 |
| Calmar (Composite) | 9.14 | 7.59 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.6173 | 0.6664 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 5/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #22,370 |
Ownership
| Metric | 4901 | AKER |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 7284.40% |
| % Institutions | — | 1582.10% |
Compare 4901 to peers
Compare AKER to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.