4218 vs 603899: NICHIBAN CO.,LTD. vs Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc
Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
42
4218•Tokyo Stock Exchange
¥1,889.00
+0.27%
60
603899•SHG
CN¥25.37
-1.48%
Quick Summary
NICHIBAN CO.,LTD. is 1.7× the market cap of Shanghai M&G Stationery Inc. 603899 pays a dividend; 4218 does not.
Price & Performance
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Current Price | ¥1,889.00 | CN¥25.37 |
| Daily Change | 0.27% | -1.48% |
| 1-Year Return | -6.90% | -15.46% |
| 52-Week High | ¥2,071.00 | CN¥35.07 |
| 52-Week Low | ¥1,865.00 | CN¥24.54 |
| 50-Day MA | — | CN¥26.16 |
| 200-Day MA | — | CN¥28.12 |
| Beta | — | 0.66 |
Size & Revenue
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $39.19B | $23.48B |
| Enterprise Value | — | $16.33B |
| Revenue (TTM) | — | $25.06B |
| Shares Outstanding | — | 920.97M |
| Float | — | 328.92M |
| Employees | — | 5,549 |
Valuation
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Trailing P/E | — | 17.83 |
| Forward P/E | — | 16.10 |
| Price / Sales | — | 0.94 |
| Price / Book | — | 2.55 |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 7.26 |
Profitability
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Profit Margin | — | 5.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | — | 4.71% |
| Return on Equity | — | 14.10% |
| Return on Assets | — | 5.32% |
| Diluted EPS (TTM) | — | 1.43 |
Growth
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | — | 8.70% |
| Earnings Growth (YoY) | — | -3.80% |
Dividends
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield | — | 3.88% |
| Dividend / Share | — | 1.00 |
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| Sortino (Composite) | -0.51 | -0.87 |
| Sharpe (Composite) | -0.40 | -0.66 |
| Calmar (Composite) | -0.12 | -0.48 |
| Hurst Exponent | 0.4483 | 0.5715 |
| Piotroski F-Score | — | 3/9 |
| Magic Formula Rank | — | #7,213 |
Ownership
| Metric | 4218 | 603899 |
|---|---|---|
| % Insiders | — | 6427.90% |
| % Institutions | — | 1394.40% |
Compare 4218 to peers
Compare 603899 to peers
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.