Sign up for free insights newsletter

3996 vs LTOUF: China Energy Engineering Corp vs Larsen & Toubro Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

39
3996Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.28
+1.59%
Hong Kong
$102.13B
Larsen & Toubro Limited
LTOUFUnited States
$47.47
+11.09%
United States
$64.18B

Quick Summary

China Energy Engineering Corp is 1.6× the market cap of Larsen & Toubro Limited. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than LTOUF. 3996 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric3996LTOUF
Current PriceHK$1.28$47.47
Daily Change1.59%11.09%
1-Year Return29.29%26.02%
52-Week HighHK$1.60$48.00
52-Week LowHK$0.98$29.84
50-Day MAHK$1.28$41.86
200-Day MAHK$1.22$42.66
Beta0.540.42

Size & Revenue

Metric3996LTOUF
Market Cap$102.13B$64.18B
Enterprise Value$360.41B$65.88B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$2.83T
Shares Outstanding9.26B1.38B
Float19.53B1.14B
Employees116,05554,596

Valuation

Metric3996LTOUF
Trailing P/E5.7330.96
Forward P/E5.1924.63
PEG Ratio1.01
Price / Sales0.230.02
Price / Book0.395.35
EV / EBITDA13.3017.65

Profitability

Metric3996LTOUF
Profit Margin1.29%5.75%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%10.68%
Return on Equity4.70%16.52%
Return on Assets1.37%4.71%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.151.38

Growth

Metric3996LTOUF
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%11.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%-4.30%

Dividends

Metric3996LTOUF
Dividend Yield2.42%0.00%
Dividend / Share0.030.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric3996LTOUF
Sortino (Composite)0.710.07
Sharpe (Composite)0.390.04
Calmar (Composite)-0.290.13
Hurst Exponent0.65430.4920
Piotroski F-Score5/94/9
Magic Formula Rank#19,691#4,034

Ownership

Metric3996LTOUF
% Insiders3399.50%0.00%
% Institutions2316.90%24.60%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.