Sign up for free insights newsletter

3996 vs LT: China Energy Engineering Corp vs Larsen & Toubro Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

39
3996Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.28
+1.59%
Hong Kong
$102.13B
₹4,096.10
-0.58%
India
$5.63T

Quick Summary

Larsen & Toubro Limited is 55.2× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than LT. 3996 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric3996LT
Current PriceHK$1.28₹4,096.10
Daily Change1.59%-0.58%
1-Year Return29.29%
52-Week HighHK$1.60₹4,418.10
52-Week LowHK$0.98₹3,434.50
50-Day MAHK$1.28₹3,901.61
200-Day MAHK$1.22₹3,835.64
Beta0.540.42

Size & Revenue

Metric3996LT
Market Cap$102.13B$5.63T
Enterprise Value$360.41B$6.31T
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$2.83T
Shares Outstanding9.26B1.38B
Float19.53B1.14B
Employees116,05554,596

Valuation

Metric3996LT
Trailing P/E5.7332.07
Forward P/E5.1922.73
PEG Ratio1.06
Price / Sales0.231.99
Price / Book0.395.59
EV / EBITDA13.3018.29

Profitability

Metric3996LT
Profit Margin1.29%5.75%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%10.68%
Return on Equity4.70%16.52%
Return on Assets1.37%4.71%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.15127.71

Growth

Metric3996LT
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%11.10%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%-4.30%

Dividends

Metric3996LT
Dividend Yield2.42%0.00%
Dividend / Share0.030.00

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric3996LT
Sortino (Composite)0.7110.71
Sharpe (Composite)0.395.66
Calmar (Composite)-0.290.80
Hurst Exponent0.65430.7805
Piotroski F-Score5/95/9
Magic Formula Rank#19,691#12,855

Ownership

Metric3996LT
% Insiders3399.50%1718.60%
% Institutions2316.90%4915.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.