Home 3996 vs 6936 3996 vs 6936: China Energy Engineering Corp vs S.F. Holding Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector. Both are listed in Hong Kong.
39
3996 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
69
6936 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary S.F. Holding Co Ltd is 2.1× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than 6936. 6936 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 3996 6936 Current Price HK$1.28 HK$35.48 Daily Change 1.59% -1.39% 1-Year Return 29.29% 0.23% 52-Week High HK$1.60 HK$46.80 52-Week Low HK$0.98 HK$33.32 50-Day MA HK$1.28 HK$35.30 200-Day MA HK$1.22 HK$37.81 Beta 0.54 0.52
Size & Revenue Metric 3996 6936 Market Cap $102.13B $219.49B Enterprise Value $360.41B $221.98B Revenue (TTM) $452.93B $308.23B Shares Outstanding 9.26B 240.00M Float 19.53B 2.47B Employees 116,055 158,761
Valuation Metric 3996 6936 Trailing P/E 5.73 14.02 Forward P/E 5.19 12.15 PEG Ratio — 1.19 Price / Sales 0.23 0.71 Price / Book 0.39 1.55 EV / EBITDA 13.30 5.86
Profitability Metric 3996 6936 Profit Margin 1.29% 3.61% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.42% 4.64% Return on Equity 4.70% 10.99% Return on Assets 1.37% 4.26% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.15 2.25
Growth Metric 3996 6936 Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.60% 7.00% Earnings Growth (YoY) -47.60% 4.90%
Dividends Metric 3996 6936 Dividend Yield 2.42% 2.53% Dividend / Share 0.03 0.89
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 3996 6936 Sortino (Composite) 0.71 0.55 Sharpe (Composite) 0.39 0.21 Calmar (Composite) -0.29 4.43 Hurst Exponent 0.6543 0.5337 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 7/9 Magic Formula Rank #19,691 #11,687
Ownership Metric 3996 6936 % Insiders 3399.50% 612.50% % Institutions 2316.90% 4645.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.