Home 3996 vs 601800 3996 vs 601800: China Energy Engineering Corp vs China Communications Construction Co Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
39
3996 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Communications Construction Co Ltd is 1.2× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than 601800. 601800 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 3996 601800 Current Price HK$1.28 CN¥7.50 Daily Change 1.59% -1.19% 1-Year Return 29.29% -19.44% 52-Week High HK$1.60 CN¥10.33 52-Week Low HK$0.98 CN¥7.50 50-Day MA HK$1.28 CN¥7.94 200-Day MA HK$1.22 CN¥8.58 Beta 0.54 0.52
Size & Revenue Metric 3996 601800 Market Cap $102.13B $121.70B Enterprise Value $360.41B $559.90B Revenue (TTM) $452.93B $726.64B Shares Outstanding 9.26B 11.81B Float 19.53B 6.54B Employees 116,055 137,471
Valuation Metric 3996 601800 Trailing P/E 5.73 5.86 Forward P/E 5.19 8.48 PEG Ratio — 1.90 Price / Sales 0.23 0.17 Price / Book 0.39 0.37 EV / EBITDA 13.30 8.03
Profitability Metric 3996 601800 Profit Margin 1.29% 2.06% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.42% 5.56% Return on Equity 4.70% 4.50% Return on Assets 1.37% 1.16% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.15 1.28
Growth Metric 3996 601800 Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.60% -9.60% Earnings Growth (YoY) -47.60% -94.50%
Dividends Metric 3996 601800 Dividend Yield 2.42% 2.57% Dividend / Share 0.03 0.20
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 3996 601800 Sortino (Composite) 0.75 -1.74 Sharpe (Composite) 0.42 -1.36 Calmar (Composite) -0.19 -3.68 Hurst Exponent 0.6543 0.5465 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 4/9 Magic Formula Rank #19,687 #17,979
Ownership Metric 3996 601800 % Insiders 3399.50% 8005.10% % Institutions 2316.90% 619.70%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.