Sign up for free insights newsletter

3996 vs 601668: China Energy Engineering Corp vs China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

39
3996Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.28
+1.59%
Hong Kong
$102.13B
CN¥4.94
-0.80%
China
$204.12B

Quick Summary

China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd is 2.0× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 601668 trades at a lower P/E than 3996. 601668 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric3996601668
Current PriceHK$1.28CN¥4.94
Daily Change1.59%-0.80%
1-Year Return29.29%-10.18%
52-Week HighHK$1.60CN¥6.13
52-Week LowHK$0.98CN¥4.88
50-Day MAHK$1.28CN¥5.02
200-Day MAHK$1.22CN¥5.34
Beta0.540.34

Size & Revenue

Metric3996601668
Market Cap$102.13B$204.12B
Enterprise Value$360.41B$754.31B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$2.12T
Shares Outstanding9.26B41.32B
Float19.53B17.48B
Employees116,055361,249

Valuation

Metric3996601668
Trailing P/E5.734.62
Forward P/E5.190.00
Price / Sales0.230.10
Price / Book0.390.42
EV / EBITDA13.307.72

Profitability

Metric3996601668
Profit Margin1.29%2.11%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%3.89%
Return on Equity4.70%7.50%
Return on Assets1.37%1.77%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.151.07

Growth

Metric3996601668
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%-21.00%

Dividends

Metric3996601668
Dividend Yield2.42%5.46%
Dividend / Share0.030.27

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric3996601668
Sortino (Composite)0.75-0.34
Sharpe (Composite)0.42-0.38
Calmar (Composite)-0.190.11
Hurst Exponent0.65430.5277
Piotroski F-Score5/93/9
Magic Formula Rank#19,687#13,319

Ownership

Metric3996601668
% Insiders3399.50%5912.50%
% Institutions2316.90%1107.90%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.