Sign up for free insights newsletter

3996 vs 601390: China Energy Engineering Corp vs China Railway Group Limited

Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.

39
3996Hong Kong Stock Exchange
HK$1.28
+1.59%
Hong Kong
$102.13B
CN¥5.32
+0.38%
China
$131.33B

Quick Summary

China Railway Group Limited is 1.3× the market cap of China Energy Engineering Corp. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than 601390. 601390 offers the higher dividend yield.

Price & Performance

Metric3996601390
Current PriceHK$1.28CN¥5.32
Daily Change1.59%0.38%
1-Year Return29.29%-6.99%
52-Week HighHK$1.60CN¥6.30
52-Week LowHK$0.98CN¥5.20
50-Day MAHK$1.28CN¥5.60
200-Day MAHK$1.22CN¥5.61
Beta0.540.55

Size & Revenue

Metric3996601390
Market Cap$102.13B$131.33B
Enterprise Value$360.41B$435.21B
Revenue (TTM)$452.93B$1.09T
Shares Outstanding9.26B20.48B
Float19.53B12.15B
Employees116,055289,250

Valuation

Metric3996601390
Trailing P/E5.736.26
Forward P/E5.194.80
PEG Ratio1.48
Price / Sales0.230.12
Price / Book0.390.35
EV / EBITDA13.306.54

Profitability

Metric3996601390
Profit Margin1.29%2.09%
Operating Margin (TTM)5.42%4.09%
Return on Equity4.70%5.02%
Return on Assets1.37%1.14%
Diluted EPS (TTM)0.150.85

Growth

Metric3996601390
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.60%-6.60%
Earnings Growth (YoY)-47.60%-35.00%

Dividends

Metric3996601390
Dividend Yield2.42%3.17%
Dividend / Share0.030.17

Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality

Metric3996601390
Sortino (Composite)0.71-0.66
Sharpe (Composite)0.391.84
Calmar (Composite)-0.29-1.28
Hurst Exponent0.65430.5002
Piotroski F-Score5/93/9
Magic Formula Rank#19,691#14,067

Ownership

Metric3996601390
% Insiders3399.50%6071.00%
% Institutions2316.90%1192.40%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.