Home 3996 vs 601186 3996 vs 601186: China Energy Engineering Corp vs China Railway Construction Corp Ltd Side-by-side comparison of key financial metrics, valuation ratios, profitability, growth, and risk-adjusted returns. Both companies are in the Industrials sector.
39
3996 • Hong Kong Stock Exchange
Quick Summary China Energy Engineering Corp and China Railway Construction Corp Ltd are similar in size. 3996 trades at a lower P/E than 601186. 601186 offers the higher dividend yield.
Price & Performance Metric 3996 601186 Current Price HK$1.28 CN¥6.93 Daily Change 1.59% -0.43% 1-Year Return 29.29% -14.13% 52-Week High HK$1.60 CN¥8.81 52-Week Low HK$0.98 CN¥6.91 50-Day MA HK$1.28 CN¥7.16 200-Day MA HK$1.22 CN¥7.73 Beta 0.54 0.33
Size & Revenue Metric 3996 601186 Market Cap $102.13B $94.11B Enterprise Value $360.41B $534.85B Revenue (TTM) $452.93B $1.03T Shares Outstanding 9.26B 11.50B Float 19.53B 6.62B Employees 116,055 250,306
Valuation Metric 3996 601186 Trailing P/E 5.73 5.87 Forward P/E 5.19 4.09 PEG Ratio — 1.76 Price / Sales 0.23 0.09 Price / Book 0.39 0.28 EV / EBITDA 13.30 7.92
Profitability Metric 3996 601186 Profit Margin 1.29% 1.78% Operating Margin (TTM) 5.42% 2.70% Return on Equity 4.70% 5.11% Return on Assets 1.37% 1.19% Diluted EPS (TTM) 0.15 1.18
Growth Metric 3996 601186 Revenue Growth (YoY) -8.60% -2.50% Earnings Growth (YoY) -47.60% -71.10%
Dividends Metric 3996 601186 Dividend Yield 2.42% 4.31% Dividend / Share 0.03 0.30
Risk-Adjusted Returns & Quality Metric 3996 601186 Sortino (Composite) 0.75 -1.38 Sharpe (Composite) 0.42 -1.10 Calmar (Composite) -0.19 -2.01 Hurst Exponent 0.6543 0.5846 Piotroski F-Score 5/9 3/9 Magic Formula Rank #19,687 #14,584
Ownership Metric 3996 601186 % Insiders 3399.50% 6167.70% % Institutions 2316.90% 1048.80%
Green highlighting indicates the more favorable value for each metric. Data is for informational purposes only and may be delayed.